Impact of Prosthesis Fit on Nutritional Health of the Lower Limb Amputee

Sarasvathy V, Dr.S.Visalakshi Rajeswari

Abstract


Socket designs ensure optimum fit between the user and the device (prosthesis), as an interface between the human – machine system. The type that an amputee is “fit with” depends on the shape of the residual limb, the length of the residual limb, activity level, prognosis, and individual preference. Patient satisfaction and function relies on pressure and force distribution (Biomechanics) on the socket-residual limb interface. The most determinant factor of prosthetic use lies in the design of the prosthetic socket and fit depends on the degree to which the prosthesis fits the stump. Well planned socket designs and careful consideration of stump presentation had set an achievement platform for the prosthetic user by maximizing range of motion, stability during the performance of daily activities, and comfortably distributing the forces exerted on the residual limb during movement and suspension. A study was conducted to analyze the health issues and their impact on the use/ acceptance of prosthesis among select amputees’. Physiological factors, obesity, age, nutritional status and co-morbidities were found to impose mechanical implications related to accessibility and well being concepts. The study highlighted prosthetic fitting to be more challenging with increased load (obesity) to transmit through the prosthetic socket in limited pressure–tolerant anatomical areas. Hence nutritional and physiotherapy intervention on effective and efficient prosthetic use was done to enhance their health and well -being.

 


Keywords


Keywords: Socket, Prosthesis, Bio mechanics, Co-morbidities, Obesity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Edward N. Brandt, Jr., and Andrew M. Pope, Chapter -5 Functional Limitations Research in Rehabilitation Science and Engineering. Enabling America- Assessing the Role of Rehabilitation Science and Engineering, Authored by Edward N. Brandt, Jr., and Andrew M. Pope, Committee on Assessing Rehabilitation Science and Engineering, Division of Health Sciences Policy, Institute Of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C, 1997, pages -100-101

Sinha, Richa and Heuvel, Wim and Arokiasamy, Perianayagam Factors affecting quality of life in lower limb amputees, Prosthetics and orthotics international, March, Volume-35, (2011) 90-96, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364610397087

Gh. Pirouzi, N. A. Abu Osman, A. Eshraghi, S. Ali, H. Gholizadeh, W.A.B. Wan Abas, "Review of the Socket Design and Interface Pressure Measurement for Transtibial Prosthesis", The Scientific World Journal, Article ID 849073, (2014) 9 pages, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/849073

Gailey Robert, Allen Kerry, Castles Julie, Kucharik Jennifer, Roeder,Mariah Review of secondary physical conditions associated with lower-limb amputation and long-term prosthesis use, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Volume 45, December, Issue No. 1,(2008) Pages 15 – 29 https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2006.11.0147

Todd A. Kuiken, MD, PhD, Nicholas P. Fey, PhD, Timothy Reissman, PhD, Suzanne B. Finucane, MS, CCRC, PTA, and Gregory A. Dumanian, MD, Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Jan; 6(1): e1632, Published online 2018 Jan 12, https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000001632 PMCID: PMC5811293,PMID: 29464163

Min-Woong Sohn , Elly Budiman-Mak, Elissa H Oh, Michael S Park, Rodney M Stuck, Neil J Stone, William B Pearce (2012), Obesity paradox in amputation risk among nonelderly diabetic men, Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012;20(2):460-462, https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2011.301

Paternò, Linda and Ibrahimi, Michele and Gruppioni, Emanuele and Menciassi, Arianna and Ricotti, Leonardo. Sockets for Limb Prostheses: A Review of Existing Technologies and Open Challenges ,IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering Volume PP, January, (2018) Pages-1-1, https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2017.2775100

Chris Lake. “The Evolution of Upper Limb Prosthetic Socket Design, JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics Volume 20(3):85-92, July 2008, Pages- 85-92,

https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0b013e31817d2f08


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2021 Sarasvathy V

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.